Reaction to Film Brainwashing 101 :: essays research papers

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, defines documentary characterization as1.Consisting of, concerning, or based on documents.2.Presenting facts objectively without editorializing or inserting false matter, as in a book or film.Academicbias.com is the website to which viewers are directed for more information about the film. On this site, it is stated, In this peeled expos, documentary filmmakers Maloney, Browning and Greenberg shine a light on policy-making correctness, academic bias, student censorship--even administrative cover-ups of death threatsThis positioning of the film presents that it is, in fact, a documentary. My belief is that, based on definition 2 above, the photo is not a documentary, but instead a good compositors case of the the facts speak for themselves actually means the facts, as I have conservatively arranged them, support my position.Evan Maloney, the filmmaker, is clearly working in the style of Michael Moore . The film utilizes satire throughout evidence the old Popularity instructional film where overdubbing is used. Interviews are presented offering only on side of the issue. Surprise attempts at interviewers for jocund relief are sprung on unsuspecting university officials. Subtle visual effects, such(prenominal) as student Charles Mitchell sitting with an American flag blanket lav him are used. Ultimately, what happened in the editing process of Brainwashing 101 is a complete unknown. Farhenhype 911 demonstrated how Michael Moore had edited President Bushs reference to the haves, and have mores, when in fact, the setting was a charity benefit at which Al Gore was also present. Given the style of the movie, I deal editing was used for key advantage. The movie purports to address political correctness, academic bias and student censorship. I believe that the movie does do this, and utilizing real depend examples works to create legitimacy for the move. In an admittedly unscient ific seem of the Internet about this movie, I found a fair number of positive reactions to the film. So some people do find the movie convincing, as people do with Michael Moore movies. To academic bias, a long scratch of the film is devoted the teaching of economics and which theories of economics should be taught. As presented in the movie, by virtue of being taught, different theories represent a bias in and of itself. Student Charles Mitchell makes the unusual statement that Marxist study is a value judgment. To me, this is not a new breakthrough in thought it could be argued that all education, throughout history, has been biased based on what has been taught.